![]() It is a great suite of tools that you should try if you are considering paying for Microsoft Office. Microsoft holds the monopoly over Office software which is why Corel came into existence as one of few alternatives to Microsoft. The Corel WordPerfect Office suite is a feature-rich alternative to Microsoft Office. In this case, however, why should one continue with OO? I am not a purist - I only care that the application works - and whether it is BSD, GPL, or a proprietary open systems application (provided I can justify the license fee) ultimately does not matter.Give This Set Of Office Tools A Trial Run For Free LibreOffice imported a WP file, converted it to LaTeX, and Kile (a LaTeX open systems GUI IDE of sorts) produced a PDF file acceptable to Adobe Acroread (the most common PDF reader used in my professional environment). However, when there is only volunteer development and support, things often do not get well done (some do, some do not). Only Apache is a non-profit under the history of StarOffice than OO (so that Sun could compete with Microsoft), but Apache still does have professional staff, not just volunteers (or so I have been told). Example: RedHat Enterprise obviously is so supported, but so is Scientific Linux (Fermilab/CERN) and so is the Princeton EL distribution likewise, OO was supported first by Sun, and then Oracle, and now Apache. ![]() My reason for not using LibreOffice is that, unlike OO but like so many community efforts, it is not supported by paid professionals. I have installed and am now contemplating the production use of LibreOffice.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |